- » Aim and Scope
- » Section Policies
- » Publication Frequency
- » Delayed Open Access
- » Archiving
- » Peer-Review
- » Publishing Ethics
- » Founder
- » Author fees
- » Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- » Plagiarism detection
- » Preprint and postprint Policy
- » Revenue Sources
Aim and Scope
The most important tasks of the journal are:
- The main task of the journal is to reflect the most interesting results of scientific research in the field of philology, pedagogy, psychological sciences;
- The journal publishes articles by scientists and specialists of the University, its branches, as well as a number of Russian scientific and educational organizations, enterprises and management bodies with which SPbUTUiE traditionally maintains close scientific contacts.
Section Policies
Open Submissions
IndexedPublication Frequency
4 issues per year
Delayed Open Access
The contents of this journal will be available in an open access format 36 month(s) after an issue is published.
Archiving
- Russian State Library (RSL)
- National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)
Peer-Review
Articles submitted to the editorial office are reviewed. The terms of reviewing in each individual case are determined by the editorial board, taking into account the creation of conditions for the fastest possible publication of the article.
Articles are sent for reviewing to specialists in the relevant field of science, practical activity, the competence and qualifications of which are confirmed by research (practical) results, academic degree, academic title, work experience, a recognized authority in this area, and having published publications on the subject under review over the past three years. articles.
The review process determines:
- Whether the content of the article corresponds to the topic stated in the title;
- To what extent the article corresponds to the modern achievements of scientific and theoretical thought;
- Whether the publication of the article is expedient, taking into account the previously published literature on this issue;
- What exactly are the positive aspects, as well as the shortcomings of the article, what corrections and additions must be made to it.
Based on the results of the analysis of the article, the reviewer formulates the final conclusion: recommended for publication; recommended for publication, subject to revision, taking into account the comments; not recommended for publication.
Reviews of scientific articles and materials are kept in the editorial office for at least 5 years. Reviews are sent to authors upon request, as well as in case of rejection of the publication as a justification for the decision by the editorial board.
Publishing Ethics
- Introduction
1.1. Publishing materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only an easy way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to establish standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: Authors, Editors of the journal, Reviewers, Publishers and the Scientific Society for the journal "Uchenye zapiski SPbUTUiE".
1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for adhering to all current guidelines in the published work.
1.3. The publisher is committed to the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our journal programs provide an impartial "account" of the development of scientific thought and research, therefore we also recognize the responsibility for the proper presentation of these "reports", especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications set out in this document.
- Duties of Editors
2.1. Decision to publish
The editor of the scientific journal "Uchenye zapiski SPbUTUiE" is personally and independently responsible for deciding on publication, often in cooperation with the relevant Scientific Society. The credibility of the work in question and its scientific relevance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor may be guided by the policy of the Editorial Board of Sociology and Law, being limited by current legal requirements in relation to libel, copyright, legality and plagiarism.
The Editor may consult with other Editors and Reviewers (or officials of the Scientific Society) when deciding to publish.
2.2. Decency
The editor must evaluate the intellectual content of the manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the Authors.
2.3. Confidentiality
The editor and the editorial board of the journal "Uchenye zapiski SPbUTUiE" are obliged not to disclose information about the accepted manuscript to all persons, with the exception of Authors, Reviewers, possible Reviewers, other scientific consultants and the Publisher, without necessity.
2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and associated with possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
2.4.2 Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely: request the Co-Editor, Assistant Editor, or cooperate with other members of the Editorial Board when reviewing the work instead of personally reviewing and making a decision) in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative and other interactions and relationships with Authors, companies and possibly other organizations associated with the manuscript.
2.5. Publication supervision
An editor who has provided convincing evidence that statements or conclusions presented in a publication are erroneous should inform the Publisher (and / or the relevant Scientific Society) in order to promptly notify the changes, withdraw the publication, raise concerns and other relevant statements. ...
2.6. Engagement and collaboration in research
The Editor, in conjunction with the Publisher (or the Scientific Society), take appropriate action in the event of ethical claims regarding reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures in general terms include interaction with the Authors of the manuscript and the reasoning of the corresponding complaint or request, but can also involve interaction with relevant organizations and research centers.
- Responsibilities of Reviewers
3.1. Influencing the decisions of the Editorial Board
Peer review assists the Editor in making a publication decision and, through appropriate interaction with the Authors, can also help the Author improve the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communication, which is at the heart of the scientific approach. The publisher shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to publication are required to do substantial work of reviewing the manuscript.
3.2. Diligence
Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review the manuscript or does not have enough time to quickly complete the work, must notify the Editor of the journal "Uchenye zapiski SPbUTUiE" and ask him to exclude him from the review process of the corresponding manuscript.
3.3. Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. This work may not be opened and discussed with anyone not authorized by the Editor.
3.4. Requirements for the manuscript and aboutobjectivity
The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the Author is unacceptable. Reviewers should clearly and reasonably express their opinions.
3.5. Recognition of primary sources
Reviewers should identify significant published works that are relevant to the topic and not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. Any statement (observation, conclusion or argument), published earlier, in the manuscript must have a corresponding bibliographic reference. The Reviewer should also draw the Editor's attention to any significant similarity or overlap between the manuscript in question and any other published work within the scope of the Reviewer's scientific competence.
3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts cannot be used in personal research without the written consent of the Author. Information or ideas obtained during the review and associated with possible benefits must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the Authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.
- Obligations of Authors
4.1. Requirements for manuscripts
4.1.1 Authors of original research reports should provide credible results of the work done as well as an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be presented accurately. The work must contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly wrong statements are perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.
4.1.2. Reviews and scientific articles must also be accurate and objective, and the editorial point of view must be clearly indicated.
4.2. Data access and storage
Authors may be requested to provide raw data relevant to the manuscript for review by Editors. Authors should be prepared to provide open access to this kind of information (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case be prepared to retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.
4.3. Originality and plagiarism
4.3.1. Authors should make sure that the complete original work is presented and, in the case of using works or statements by other Authors, should provide appropriate bibliographic references or extracts.
4.3.2. Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as the author's, to copying or paraphrasing significant parts of someone else's work (without attribution), to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all its forms is unethical and unacceptable.
4.4. Plurality, redundancy and simultaneity of publications
4.4.1. In general, an Author should not publish a manuscript largely devoted to the same research in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.
4.4.2. In general, the Author should not submit a previously published article for consideration to another journal.
4.5. Recognition of primary sources
The contributions of others should always be recognized. Authors should cite publications that are relevant to the performance of the work presented. Data obtained privately, for example, through conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the explicit written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as evaluating manuscripts or granting grants, should not be used without the express written permission of Authors of work related to confidential sources.
4.6. Authorship of the publication
4.6.1. The authors of the publication can only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the concept of the work, development, execution or interpretation of the presented research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as Contributors. In cases where research participants have made a significant contribution in a particular direction in a research project, they should be listed as persons who have made a significant contribution to this research.
4.6.2. The author must make sure that all participants who made a significant contribution to the study are represented as Co-Authors and are not cited as Co-Authors of those who did not participate in the study, that all Co-Authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.
4.7. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest
4.7.1. All Authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other Any existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as influencing the results or conclusions presented in the work.
4.7.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, shareholding, royalties, expert opinions, patent applications or patent registrations, grants, and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.
4.8. Substantial errors in published works
If the Author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the Author must inform the Editor of the journal "Sociology and Law" and interact with the Editor in order to promptly withdraw the publication or correct errors. If the Editor or Publisher receives information from a third party that the publication contains material errors, the Author is obliged to remove the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.
- Obligations of the Publisher
5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures to facilitate the fulfillment of ethical responsibilities by Editors, Reviewers and Authors of Sociology and Law in accordance with these requirements. The publisher must be confident that potential revenues from advertising or reprints have not influenced the Editors' decisions.
5.2. The publisher should support the Editors of Sociology and Law in considering complaints about the ethical aspects of published materials and help to interact with other journals and / or Publishers, if this contributes to the performance of the Editors' duties.
5.3. The publisher should promote good research practice and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, retirement procedures, and error correction.
5.4. The publisher should provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice) if necessary.
Founder
- Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
Author fees
Publication in “Uchenye zapiski St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics" is free of charge for all the authors.
The journal doesn't have any Article processing charges.
The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Plagiarism detection
"Uchenye zapiski St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.
Preprint and postprint Policy
Prior to acceptance and publication in "Uchenye zapiski St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics", authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.
As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in "Sovremennaya revmatologiya" (the “Modern Rheumatology Journal”) we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.
Glossary (by SHERPA)
Revenue Sources
The publication of the journal is financed by the funds of the parent organization, at the expense of the publisher, publication of advertising materials, publication of reprints, article processment charges.
